Omit passProps from layout declaration

passProps are handled in Js and should not go over the bridge as they aren’t serialisable.
Fixes #3969

lib/src/commands/Commands.test.ts

 
   describe('push', () => {
     it('deep clones input to avoid mutation errors', () => {
-      const obj = {};
-      uut.push('theComponentId', { component: { name: 'name', passProps: { foo: obj } } });
-      expect(mockCommandsSender.push.mock.calls[0][2].data.passProps.foo).not.toBe(obj);
+      const options = {};
+      uut.push('theComponentId', { component: { name: 'name', options } });
+      expect(mockCommandsSender.push.mock.calls[0][2].data.options).not.toBe(options);
     });
 
     it('resolves with the parsed layout', async () => {

lib/src/commands/LayoutTreeCrawler.test.ts

     expect(node.data.options).toEqual({});
   });
 
+  it('Components: omits passProps after processing so they are not passed over the bridge', () => {
+    const node = {
+      type: LayoutType.Component,
+      data: {
+        name: 'compName',
+        passProps: {}
+      }
+    };
+    uut.crawl(node);
+    expect(node.data.passProps).toBeUndefined();
+  });
+
   describe('navigation options', () => {
     let options;
     let node;

lib/src/commands/LayoutTreeCrawler.ts

     this._assertComponentDataName(node);
     this._savePropsToStore(node);
     this._applyStaticOptions(node);
+    node.data.passProps = undefined;
   }
 
   _savePropsToStore(node) {